DIVESTING FROM ACCOUNTABILITY: IOC ASSET TRANSFERS AND THE LIABILITY FOR LEGACY POLLUTION IN THE NIGER DELTA

Authors

  • Abiodun Amuda-Kannike Author
  • Ibrahim Bello Ibrahim Author
  • Shehuluqman Sambo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68584/rsuflj.v1i1.9

Keywords:

Corporate Veil Piercing, Environmental Liability, Legacy Pollution, IOC divestment, Petroleum Industry Act

Abstract

International Oil Companies (IOCs) are strategically pulling out of Nigeria's Niger Delta, selling off billions of dollars' worth of onshore assets and shifting their focus to the comparatively safer deep water activities. A basic environmental justice dilemma is brought up by this corporate restructuring: does the seller's obligation for decades of cumulative environmental destruction end with the sale of petroleum assets? This article reveals a hazardous regulatory gap regarding "legacy pollution," the toxic legacy of oil spills, gas flaring, and ecosystem destruction that predates current ownership, through a critical examination of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021 and the historic ruling in Alame v. Shell Plc. We contend that Nigeria's present "buyer beware" policy regarding asset transfers permits environmental impunity by shifting unmet remedial costs to undercapitalized indigenous businesses and preventing devastated host communities from pursuing legal action. We suggest requiring "Retention of Liability" clauses in divestment approvals, along with pre sale environmental audits and financial guarantees, based on comparative jurisprudence from the US Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and EU environmental liability frameworks. Without such changes, divestiture turns into a complex way to externalize environmental debt onto the Nigerian government and its most vulnerable residents rather  than a genuine corporate transaction.

8 14

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08